Evaluation of Steiner's cephalometric analysis in adult individuals with aesthetically acceptable perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.21.07Keywords:
Cephalometry, Orthodontics, Perception, RadiographyAbstract
Steiner's analysis is based on interpreting both soft and hard tissues by evaluating different cranial parts. This research aimed to assess Steiner's cephalometric analysis in adult individuals with aesthetically acceptable perception in lateral cephalic skull radiographs. The study was observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional, in a population of 248 cephalic radiographs of people between 18 and 45 years of age from the city of Cuenca during the periods 2020, 2021, and 2022, using the AutoCAD 2023 software. Descriptive statistics were used, and the Wilcoxon range and Student's t-tests were used to compare the measurements. The level of significance was considered 5 % (p<0.05). Increased statistical differences were found in the Silla-Nasion and Nasion- Point angle (SNA), angulation of the Upper Incisor with Silla-Nasion (S-N), angle of the longitudinal axis of the upper incisor and the Nasion-Point A plane (1-NA). , Lower Incisor to the Gonion-Gnathion plane (L1-Go-Gn), S line and diminished in the Silla- Point L segment (SL), Gonion-Gnathion and Silla-Nasion angle, Upper incisor-Palatine plane and interincisal angle, demonstrating differences between Steiner's norm with the means of the study. However, the bone bases are similar to the author's proposals. The aesthetic canons have varied. A slightly protrusive profile and the prominence of the chin and lips is the new social perception that, together with factors, demonstrate a difference from the standard norms. For this reason, it was necessary to develop a cephalometric analysis based on distinctive features that allowed for establishing values of harmony in this population.
Downloads
References
GhorbanyJavadpour F, Khanemasjedi M. Soft tissue facial profile and anteroposterior lip positioning in Iranians Introduction. Journal of Dental School [Internet]. 2014. [citado 12 Ene 24];32(2):90–5. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24910646/.
Farez D, Lima M, Jiménez M, Verdugo V. Comparación del grosor de tejidos blandos del mentón en individuos con diferentes patrones de crecimiento facial en radiografías cefálicas laterales. Revista Estomatológica Herediana [Internet]. 2021. [citado 13 Ene 2024];31(4):272–80. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1019- 43552021000400272.
Pérez M, Carreño S, Araya P, Parada J, Palomino H, Martínez V, et al. Determinación de Valores de Armonía del Perfil Facial en la Población Chilena. International journal of odontostomatology [Internet]. 2021. [citado 23 Ene 2024];15(1):137–44. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718- 381X2021000100137.
González Y, Veliz O, Hernández J. Perfil facial. Relación clínica y cefalométrica. [Internet]. 2022. [citado 17 Feb 2024];1–8. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029- 30432022000100151.
González Y, Veliz O. Estética y patrones craneofaciales en la Ortodoncia. Revista Científica Villa Clara [Internet]. 2022. [citado 3 Mar 2024];26(1):151–60. Disponible en: https://convencionsalud.sld.cu/index.php/convencionsalud22/2022/paper/downlo ad/736/774.
Singh R, Awasthy A, Krishna P, Mazhar H, Soni S, Thomas A. Do We Vary from Caucasians! Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery in Chhattisgarhi Population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg [Internet]. 2022. [citado 3 Abr 2024];21(4):1237–43. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36896062/.
Hlongwa P. Cephalometric analysis: manual tracing of a lateral cephalogram. South African Dental Journal [Internet]. 2019. [citado 22 Abr 2024];74(6):318–22. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011- 85162019000600009.
Prameswari N, Herniyati H, Sucahyo B, Brahmanta A, Syahdinda M. Cephalometric Analysis, Severity Malocclusion, and Orthodontic Treatment Need Using IOTN in Deaf Children. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2022. [citado 3 May 2024];16(3):599–605. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34820826/.
Mustafa C, Botan A, Hassan B. Cephalometric Norms of Erbil Kurdish Adults. Polytechnic Journal [Internet]. 2020. [citado 23 May 2024];10(1):130–4. Disponible en: https://journals.epu.edu.iq/index.php/polytechnic/article/view/172.
Poggi I. Parámetros cefalométricos para el diagnóstico esqueletal en primera dentición. Revista uruguaya Ortopedia y Ortodoncia [Internet]. 2022. [citado 23 May 2024];5(2):42–57. Disponible en: http://www.iuceddu.com.uy/revistaortopediayortodoncia/index.php/ORTUY/issu e/current.
Girhe V, Borle R, Datey P, Shirivastav S, Bhola N. Cephalometric norms for the north Indian population: A systematic review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2022. [citado 24 May 2024];13(2):172–9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426702/.
Brevi B, Di Blasio A, Di Blasio C, Piazza F, D’Ascanio L, Sesenna E. Quale analisi cefalometrica per la chirurgia maxillo-mandibolare in pazienti con sindrome delle apnee ostruttive notturne? Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica [Internet]. 2015. [citado 24 May 2024];35(5):332–7. Disponible en: https://www.actaitalica.it/issues/2015/5-2015/05-Brevi-ABS.html.
Elkaseh A, Shayeb M, Kuduruthullah S, Elsubeihi E. Cephalometrics of Libyan adults. Asian J Surg [Internet]. 2022. [citado 24 May 2024];45(5):1089–94. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34627686/.
Montanari V, Bruno G, Cavallin F. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Minerva pediatrics
[Internet]. 2022. [citado 20 May 2024];74(2):160–6.
Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32418409/.
Wu B, Kaban L, Peacock Z. Correlation of Cephalometric Analyses With Clinical Impression in Orthognathic Surgery Patients: Harvold and Steiner Analyses. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2019. [citado 20 May 2024];77(11):2308–17. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31276658/.
Imani M, Farzaneh S, Ghanbari A, Arab S. Cephalometric Norms in an Iranian Kurdish Population According to the Steiner Analysis. Iranian Journal of Orthodontics [Internet]. 2019. [citado 20 May 2024];14(1):1–5. Disponible en: https://www.ijorth.com/article_245735.html.
Arora A, Peter E, Ani G. Ready to use norms for arnett bergman soft-tissue cephalometric analysis for South Indian population. Contemp Clin Dent [Internet]. 2018. [citado 22 May 2024];9(5):45–51. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006885/.
Jha M. Cephalometric Evaluation Based on Steiner’s Analysis on Adults of Bihar. J Pharm Bioallied Sci [Internet]. 2021. [citado 24 May 2024];13(2):1360–4. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8686945/.
Esmaeili S, Malek M, Khosravani S. Evaluation of facial profile characteristics of aesthetically pleasing Iranian faces. J World Fed Orthod [Internet]. 2023. [citado 26 May 2024];12(2):76–89. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36906490/.
Zamora C. Compendio de Cefalometría- Análisis Clínico y Práctico. 1era Edición. Vol. 1. Venezuela: AMOLCA; 2004.
Fernández J, Da Silva O. Atlas: Cefalometría y análisis facial. Ripianao S.A, editor. Vol. 1. España: Madrid Ripianao S.A; 2009.
Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2019. [citado 4 May 2024];23:167–78. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30941649/.
Batista L, Gutíerrez J, Silva A. Evaluación del perfil labial con las cefalometrías de Steiner, Ricketts y Holdaway en una población de Nayarit. Revista Tamé [Internet]. 2021. [cited 26 May 2024];9(27):1095–7. Disponible en: https://www.uan.edu.mx/d/a/publicaciones/revista_tame/numero_27/Tam2127- 06i.pdf.
Farishta S, Kumar D, Srinivas K, Subhash C, Zinnie N. Cephalometric evaluation-based on Steiner’s analysis on young adults of Chhattisgarh, India. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice [Internet]. 2011. [citado 20 Feb 2024];12(3):174–8. Disponible en: https://thejcdp.com/doi/JCDP/pdf/10.5005/jp- journals-10024-1030.
Kumar M, Kambalyal P. Cephalometric norms for evalution of Mithilanchal adult people (Bihar) by Steiner’s analysis. Journal of Oral and Dental Health [Internet]. 2020. [citado 23 Mar 2024];6(1):27–31. Disponible en: http://jodh.in/doc/vol6issue1-2021.pdf.
Safiee Z, Hanapi Z, Sheh Y. Factors Affecting the Readiness of Using AutoCAD Software in Teaching. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences [Internet]. 2019. [citado 26 Mar 2024];9(5):128–37. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334265384_Factors_Affecting_the_Re adiness_of_Using_AutoCAD_Software_in_Teaching.
Sayfullayeva D. Methodology of using AutoCAD softwarein developing technical creativity of students. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal [Internet]. 2022. [citado 26 Mar 2024];10(4):661–71. Disponible en: https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/article/view/1766/1642.
Quiroz J. Comparación entre los sistemas manual de limas de acero inoxidable y el rotatorio de limas de níquel titanio, en la conformación de conductos radiculares curvos in vitro. Odontología Vital [Internet]. 2019. [citado 29 Mar 2024];2(31):31–6. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659- 07752019000200031.
Wang X, Ling M, Wang J, Xue H. The crown-root morphology of central incisors in different skeletal malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod [Internet]. 2019. [citado 29 Mar 2024];20(1):1–11. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31111270/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Eugenio Espejo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
