Complementary anesthesia during failed blocks of inferior alveolar nerve in cases of irreversible pulpitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.08.03Keywords:
Anesthesia, Articaine, PulpitisAbstract
The researchers carried out a study with a mixed approach, of a descriptive non-experimental type. The population was made up of all the medical records of patients who were attended at the Dental Care Clinic of the Autonomous Regional University of the Andes, during the free care campaign carried out in the period April-August 2019. 30 medical records were selected through non-probability sampling based on criteria. The objective of this study was to characterize the anesthetic use of vestibular and intraligamentary infiltrations using 4% articaine with epinephrine 1: 100,000, in lower molars and premolars diagnosed with IP after a failed block of inferior alveolar nerve in the investigated context. There was no a statistically insignificant margin, in the case of women, the intraligamentary injection showed better results by (p = 0.109). The intraligamentary injection was more effective in the premolars (p = 0.847). Intra-league injection obtained 86.7% anesthetic success, while vestibular infiltration was 80% with respect to the entire sample where they were applied (p = 0.624).
Downloads
References
Malamed SF. Manual de Anestesia Local. 6ta Edición. Londres: Elsevier Health Sciences Brazil; 2013.
Ulfohn AG, Gilligan JM. La extracción dentaria. 5ta Edición. Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2014.
Martínez. Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial. 1ra Edición. México: Mundo Moderno; 2010.
De pedro A, Mena J. Fracaso del bloqueo del nervio alveolar inferior en molares mandibulares con pulpitis irreversible aguda Revisión bibliográfica. Científ Dent [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2019 Mar 4]; 11(12): 139-144. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305046239_Fracaso_del_bloqueo_del_nervio_alveolar_inferior_en_molares_mandibulares_con_pulpitis_irreversible_aguda_Revision_bibliografica?channel=doi&linkId=57802afa08ae9485a439bc21&showFulltext=true.
Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S. Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Oral Facial Pain Headache [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2019 Mar 4]; 31(2): 124-128. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28437508/. DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1642.
Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S. Anesthetic Efficacy of Four Percent Articaine for Pulpal Anesthesia by Using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2011 [citado 2019 Mar 20]; 37(12): 1603-1607. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22099890/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.009.
Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S. Successful pulpal anesthesia for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. J Americ Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2019 Mar 20]; 148(4): 267-271. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28190451/. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.002.
Shabin S. Management of Local Anesthesia Failures in Endodontics with Different Anesthetic Techniques and Agents. Annual Research & Review in Biology. [Internet] 2014 [citado 2019 Mar 20]; 4(7): 1080-1091. Disponible en: http://www.journalarrb.com/index.php/ARRB/article/download/25037/46838/.
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Different Supplementary Local Anesthetic Techniques after Failure of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis in Mandibular Teeth. J Endod [Internet]. 2012 [citado 2019 Abr 25]; 38(4): 421-425. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22414822/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006.
Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Ghasemi N, Ahmadi F. Success Rate of 3 Injection Methods with Articaine for Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A CONSORT Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2019 Abr 25]; 44(10): 1462-1466. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30174101/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.010.
Cohen S, Hargreaves K. Vías de la pulpa. Barcelona: Elsevier Science; 2011.
Ashraf H, Kazem M, Dianat O, Noghrehkar F. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Block and Infiltration Anesthesia Administered in Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod [Internet]. 2013 [citado 2019 Ago 25]; 39(1): 6-10. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23228249/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.012.
Rogers BS, Botero TM, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine as a Supplemental Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2019 Ago 25]; 40(6): 753-758. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24862701/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.022.
Kung J, McDonagh M, Sedgley CM. Does Articaine Provide an Advantage over Lidocaine in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2019 Ago 24]; 41(11): 1784-1794. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26293174/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.001.
Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2011 [citado 2019 Jun 8]; 142(5): 493-504. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21531931/. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0219.
Abazarpoor R, Parirokh M, Nakhaee N, Abbott P. A Comparison of Different Volumes of Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. J Endod [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2019 Jul 14]; 41(9):1408-1411. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26149210/. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.015.
Fowler S, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M. Anesthetic Success of an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Supplemental Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Molars and Premolars in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. J Endod [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2019 Jun 8]; 42(3): 390-392. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26831048/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.025.
Saatchi M, Shafiee M, Khademi A, Memarzadeh B. Anesthetic Efficacy of Gow-Gates Nerve Block, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, and Their Combination in Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2019 Ago 7]; 44(3): 384-388. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29273494/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.008.
Shapiro MR, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC, Botero TM. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2019 Ago 7]; 44(4): 523-528. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29397214/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003.
Peters M, Botero T. In Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Articaine is 3.6 Times More Efficacious Than Lidocaine in Achieving Anesthetic Success When Used for Supplementary Infiltration After Mandibular Block Anesthesia. J Evid Based Dent Pract [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2019 Ago 7]; 17(2): 99-101. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28501071/. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.03.003.
Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine When Used as a Supplemental Anesthetic. J Endod [Internet]. 2007 [citado 2019 Jun 24]; 33(4): 403-405. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17368327/. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019.
