REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
128
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
129
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
130
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
131
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
Element Description
P (Population)
Teenagers who died by suicide
I (Intervention of interest)
Psychological autopsy
C (Comparison)
No comparison is made
O (Result) Suicide risk factors identified through
psychological autopsy
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
132
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
133
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
Identification
Records identified in the
databases
N= 76
• PubMED (N=45)
• SciELO (N=12)
• Science Direct (N=9)
• Redalyc (N=10)
Duplicate records removed
N= 8
Screening
Review of the title and abstract
N= 68
Excluded N= 42
• Unrelated to the study
objective
• Population other than
adolescents
• Do not address
psychological autopsy
• Review articles,
bibliographic studies, or
meta-analyses
Included
Eligibility
• Review of the full text
N= 26
• Methodological quality
assessment using CRF-QS
Excluded after reading the full text
and methodological assessment
N= 12
• Did not meet inclusion criteria.
• Insufficient methodological
quality according to CRF-QS.
• Full text not available.
• Insufficient information to
address the study objective.
Included in the systematic
review
N=14
Identification of studies through databases and registers
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
cc
BY NC ND
134
Article title
Authors
Usefulness of the psychological autopsy
Identified suicide risk factors
1 Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the
Colombian Coffee Region.
(25) It facilitated the characterization of the personal,
family, and contextual circumstances before suicide
and the identification of mental health history, through
teleconference interviews conducted by two
psychiatrists and a psychiatry resident, complemented
by hospital medical records.
Major depression, forced labor during adolescence,
previous suicide attempts, physical and verbal abuse,
behavioral problems, family difficulties, and
substance use.
2 A multi-method psychological
autopsy study on youth suicides
in the Netherlands in 2017:
Feasibility, main outcomes, and
recommendations.
(26) It allowed the integration of information from
different sources to reconstruct the circumstances and
experiences before suicide in adolescents, through
interviews with parents, peers and teachers,
complemented by questionnaires answered by the
parents.
Traumatic events during childhood such as bullying,
cyberbullying, family violence and abuse, mental
disorders, history of suicide attempts, academic
difficulties and school pressure, conflicts in family and
social relationships, limitations in access to mental
health care, exposure to suicide-related content on
social media, and stress related to sexual orientation.
3 Social media use of adolescents
who died by suicide: lessons
from a psychological autopsy
study.
(27) She contributed to understanding the role of social
networks in the lives of adolescents who died by
suicide and their relationship with experiences of
well-
being and distress, through semi
-structured
interviews with parents, peers, teachers and health
professionals.
Dependence on and excessive use o
f social media,
social comparison and distorted perceptions about
mental health, exposure to self-harm and suicidal
content, participation in challenges and impulsive
behaviors, poor communication with adults,
communities that validate suicidal ideation, and online
sexual extortion.
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
cc
BY NC ND
135
4 Suicide warning signs that are
challenging to recognize: a
psychological autopsy study of
Korean adolescents.
(28) It facilitated the identification of the psychological,
social, and environmental circumstances preceding
the suicide, as well as any unrecognized warning
signs. Semi -structured interviews were conducted,
supplemented by standardized scales of impulsivity,
depression, ADHD, internet addiction, and
personality, administered to the parents.
Depression, history of self -harm or suicide attempts,
family conflicts such as divorce or separation of
parents, as well as economic problems, risk of internet
addiction, family history of psychiatric disorders and
suicidal behaviors, traumatic experiences, academic
pressure and behaviors linked to avoidance or with a
tendency towards submission.
5 Characteristics of Mexican
children and adolescents who
died by suicide: A study of
psychological autopsies.
(29) He characterized the sociodemographic and family
circumstances related to suicidal behavior through
personal interviews with at least two first-degree
relatives of the deceased, conducted between 30 and
60 days after the suicide.
Alcohol consumption in both adolescents and their
parents or caregivers, dysfunctional families, domestic
violence, and impulsive behaviors.
6 Psychological autopsy review
on mental health crises and
suicide among youth in
Pakistan.
(30) It in t e g r a t e d s o ci o d em o g r a p hi c , cl i ni c a l ,
psychosocial, and family information to characterize
the circumstances associated with deaths classified as
suicide, based on clinical records, forensic reports, and
psychological autopsy interviews conducted with
multiple sources.
Major depression, psychoactive substance use, hopelessness,
suicidal thoughts, irritability, family conflicts,
difficulty controlling impulses and aggressive
behaviors, low adherence to psychological-psychiatric
treatments and lack of mental health services.
7 Who is at risk of dying Young
from suicide and sudden
violent death? Common and
specific risk factors among
children, adolescents, and
young adults.
(31) He examined the psychological, family, and social
characteristics of the deceased young people,
considering the circumstances associated with suicide
in relation to those observed in other groups, through
semi-structured psychological autopsy interviews
with immediate family members.
History of violence or sexual abuse, borderline
p e r s o n a l i t y d i s o r d e r , p r e v i o u s p s yc h i a t r i c
hospitalization, recent stressful events, poor academic
performance, adverse childhood experiences, and lack
of professional support.
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
cc
BY NC ND
136
8 Ps ycho logical st ra ins and
suicide attempt: Results from a
psychological autopsy study
wit h Chinese rural y o u n g
suicides.
(3 2) He assessed psychological and environmental
conditions before suicide and the associated stress
experiences through interviews with informants and
the application of the Beck Suicide Intent Scale (SIS).
Psychological stress, mental disorders, social
isolation, difficulties in coping skills, unfulfilled
aspirations, economic or social deprivation, value
conflicts, low educational level, stressful situations,
physical illnesses, and limitations of personal
resources to cope with adverse situations.
9 A d d i t i o n a l v a l u e o f p e e r
informants in psychological
autopsy studies of youth
suicides.
(33) The information provided by the parents regarding
the psychological, social, school, and family
circumstances before the suicide was supplemented
through semi - structured interviews with peers,
teachers, and health professionals connected to the
young people.
Substance use, academic pressure, family conflicts,
self-harm, bullying, influence of social networks and
suicidal contagion, problems in peer relationships and
difficulties in affective relationships, perfectionism
and communication of suicidal ideas.
10 Childhood suicide in Tunisia:
Forensic and Psychological
Aspects.
(34) He integrated family, medical, psychological, and
forensic information to characterize the circumstances
and background associated with suicidal behavior in
adolescents, based on autopsy reports and medical
records.
Dysfunctional families, domestic violence, psychiatric
disorders, suicide attempts, school difficulties,
substance abuse, personal problems, grief, breakups,
and unplanned pregnancies.
11 Differences between children
and adolescents who commit
su i cid e an d th eir pee rs: A
p s yc h o l o g i c a l a u t o p s y o f
suicide victims compared to
a c c i d e n t v i c t i m s a n d a
community sample.
(35) He analyzed the psychological characteristics and
stressful circumstances associated with suicide
through retrospective interviews with parents and
integration of hospital records and police reports.
Subthreshold depression, pre -suicidal interest,
ex peri ences o f em oti onal loss, d ifficul ty
communicating problems to parents, behavioral
problems, bullying, emotional vulnerability,
impulsivity, history of suicide attempts, and less
family support.
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
cc
BY NC ND
137
12 S u i c i d e o r a c c i d e n t ? A
psychological autopsy study of
suicide in youths under the age
of 16 compared to deaths
labeled as accidents.
(36) It allowed for a comparison of the prior circumstances
between the cases of suicide and accident and the
evaluation of possible classification errors through
interviews with family members, conducted by
specialists in psychiatry and child psychiatry, review
of medical and police records, and application of
standardized questionnaires.
Interpersonal conflicts, prior interest in suicide,
subthreshold depression, emotional vulnerability,
behavioral changes, significant losses, mental health
problems, impulsivity, and exposure to suicides in the
environment.
13 Psych os oci al f a c t o r s i n
a d o l e s c e n t s u i c i d e s : A
psychological autopsy - based
study.
(37) It broadened the understanding of the psychosocial
conditions and life events before suicide, based on
interviews with family members, friends, close
acquaintances, and police personnel, supplemented
with medical and forensic information.
Depressive sympto ms, high family expectations,
social isolation, previous suicide attempts, anger,
aggressiveness and impulsivity, loss of significant
people, previous communication of suicidal ideation,
academic pressure and family history before suicide.
14 Familial firearm culture among
the families of youth who died
by firearm suicide in Maryland:
a q u a l i t a t i v e a n a l ys i s o f
psychological autopsy interviews.
(38) He examined the influence of family context and the
availability of firearms on adolescent suicide through
semi-structured interviews with family members and
friends, conducted by a psychiatrist and a psychiatry
resident, one year after the death.
Mental disorders, previous suicidal ideation and
attempts, access and availability of firearms in the
home, normalization of their use in the family
environment, lack of information on restricting access
to lethal means, inadequate storage and low perception
of danger.
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
138
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
139
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
140
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
141
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
142
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
143
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
144
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.
Psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying suicide risk factors in adolescents: A systematic review
Autopsia Psicológica como herramienta para identificación de factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes: Revisión sistemática
https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.27.09
Authors:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara1 – https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5768-6433
Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores2 – https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3239-9386
Affiliation:
1Higher Technological Institute Republic of Germany (ISTRA), Riobamba, Chimborazo.
2Private Institution, Quito, Pichincha.
Corresponding author: Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara. Higher Technological Institute Republic of
Germany (ISTRA). Address: Veloz and Vargas Torres, Riobamba, Ecuador. Email: lmoreanoj@istra.edu.ec.
Telephone: 0995239576.
Received: Juny, 6 2026 Accepted: September, 18 2026
ABSTRACT
Suicide among adolescents is a public health problem due to the interplay of multiple factors involved in its
occurrence. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific evidence regarding the usefulness of
psychological autopsy in identifying risk factors for suicide among adolescents. A systematic review was
conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and selected and evaluated 14 original articles using the
CRF-QS instrument. The related findings showed that psychological autopsy makes it possible to access
retrospective information from various sources and to identify risk factors for mental health problems, a
history of suicidal behavior, violence, family conflicts, social isolation, academic difficulties, substance use,
and issues related to the digital environment. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to look beyond the
completed act to reconstruct the circumstances that preceded it and highlight factors that might otherwise go
unnoticed.
Keywords: Adolescent; Suicide Risk Factors.
RESUMEN
El suicidio en adolescentes constituye un problema de salud pública debido a la interacción de múltiples
factores que intervienen en su aparición. El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar la evidencia científica
sobre la utilidad de la autopsia psicológica para la identificación de los factores de riesgo del suicidio en
adolescentes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, seleccionándose
14 artículos originales evaluados mediante el instrumento CRF-QS. Los hallazgos mostraron que la autopsia
psicológica posibilita acceder a información retrospectiva de diversas fuentes y reconocer factores de riesgo
relacionados con problemas de salud mental, antecedentes de conducta suicida, violencia, conflictos familiares,
aislamiento social, dificultades escolares, consumo de sustancias y problemáticas vinculadas al entorno digital.
Así, la autopsia psicológica permite ir más allá del hecho consumado para reconstruir las circunstancias que
lo precedieron y hacer visibles factores que de otro modo, podrían permanecer inadvertidos.
Palabras clave: adolescente; suicidio; factores de riesgo.
INTRODUCTION
Adolescence is the developmental interval between childhood and adulthood, occurring between ages 10 and
19; a fundamental stage for the individual's comprehensive development.
(1)
Changes are evident at the physical,
sexual, and cognitive levels. In the latter, the development of cognitive functions such as reasoning and
decision-making is notable and crucial to adolescent development. However, in this stage of emotional
vulnerability, the construction of identity and autonomy can generate confusion and stress.
(2)
Therefore, emotional problems that are not managed correctly can be associated with fatal consequences
such as suicide, considered the deliberate act of taking one's own life. It is the third leading cause of death
among young people aged 15 to 29 worldwide, with more than 720 000 deaths annually; moreover, for every
completed suicide, there are many more attempts.
(3)
In Ecuador, 1 106 suicides were recorded in 2023, the
majority of which were committed by young men, placing the country among the ten with the highest rates
of adolescent suicide.
(4)
Factors for suicide in adolescents are complex and encompass biological, psychological, familial, and social
dimensions. These include genetic and neurobiological determinants
(5)
as well as mental health conditions,
hopelessness, and low self-esteem.
(6,7)
Furthermore, suicide attempts are recognized as warning signs of
serious risk,
(8)
while substance abuse is associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of suicidal
behavior.
(9)
Similarly, self-harm is a relevant factor that should be considered in the comprehensive assessment
of suicide risk in this age group.
(10)
The family and social environment also plays a crucial role; it has been noted that neglect or lack of affection
creates a hostile environment that negatively impacts mental health.
(11)
In the school setting, factors such as
bullying and academic stress increase emotional vulnerability.
(12,13)
Likewise, discrimination and isolation
raise the risk of self-destructive behaviors,
(14)
especially in adolescents who face stigmatization due to their
sexual orientation or gender identity.
(11)
Given the complexity and interaction of these factors in suicidal behavior, the psychological autopsy is defined
as a retrospective technique that allows the reconstruction of the mental, social, familial, occupational, and
academic state of a deceased person.
(15)
This tool provides complementary information in the analysis of
death in doubtful cases,
(16)
and in the context of suicide, it facilitates the identification of risk signs that may
have gone unnoticed and that contributed to this outcome.
(15)
Studies that have used psychological autopsy agree that mental health conditions,
(17)
the influence of family
and school factors,
(18)
lack of access to psychiatric and psychological treatment, along with family problems,
can influence suicidal behavior.
(19,20)
Therefore, psychological autopsy has been used to understand the
circumstances surrounding suicide and to identify risk factors associated with this fatal outcome.
This research stems from a specific need: the importance of identifying factors that can increase the risk of
suicide in adolescents. While scientific literature exists that focuses specifically on suicide cases, the available
information on its usefulness in identifying risk factors in adolescents has not yet been integrated and
analyzed together. This justifies conducting a systematic review to synthesize the available findings.
For this reason, the study in question aimed to analyze the scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological
autopsy for the identification of suicide risk factors in adolescents.
METHOD
This research is a systematic review of scientific literature, prepared following the guidelines of the 2020
PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),
(21)
to analyze
the available scientific evidence on the usefulness of psychological autopsy for identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The study used the PICO format, which is most appropriate for structuring the
research question and organizing the review components by population, intervention of interest, and expected
outcomes, without establishing a comparison group.
(22)
(Table 1)
The research question posed was: What is the usefulness of psychological autopsy as a tool for identifying
suicide risk factors in adolescents?
Table 1.
PICO format
Search strategy
For data collection, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, and ScienceDirect
databases to identify studies related to the usefulness of psychological autopsies in identifying suicide risk
factors in adolescents. The search was carried out between May and July 2026 and included documents
published between 2012 and 2026 in Spanish and English.
DeCS descriptors were used in SciELO and MeSH in PubMed, including "suicide," "adolescent," and "risk
factors." The free-text term "psychological autopsy" was also included, as it was not found in the DeCS or
MeSH thesauri. The terms were combined using the Boolean operator AND, adapting the search syntax to
each database consulted.
Search strategy used according to the database
In PubMed, the search used the MeSH descriptors "Suicide," "Adolescent," and "Risk factors," along with
the free term "Psychological autopsy," using the Boolean operator AND.
In SciELO, the following DeCS descriptors were used: ''Suicide'', ''Adolescent'', ''Risk factors'', along with
the free term ''Psychological autopsy'', also using the Boolean operator AND.
In ScienceDirect, the search was performed using English keywords: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent,
and risk factors with the Boolean operator AND.
In Redalyc, the following Spanish terms were used: psychological autopsy, suicide, adolescent, and risk
factors, combined with the Boolean operator AND.
These strategies retrieved 76 records, distributed as follows: PubMed (n=45), SciELO (n=12), ScienceDirect
(n=9), and Redalyc (n=10).
Inclusion criteria
• Original articles of an observational, experimental, or field nature.
• Published between 2012 and July 2026.
• Open access and full PDF.
• Written in Spanish or English.
• Studies that included adolescent populations. In studies that included different age groups, only
information on adolescents was included.
• Documents where psychological autopsy was the primary method of gathering information.
• Studies that explicitly mention risk factors associated with suicide.
Exclusion criteria
• Publication outside the required age range.
Selection process
After searching the databases described, we removed duplicate documents. We then examined the titles and
abstracts of the identified articles to determine their relevance to the objective. We fully reviewed relevant
articles and verified them against the pre-established inclusion criteria and keywords. Articles that were not
related to the study objective or that met exclusion criteria were discarded. The PRISMA 2020 flowchart
(Figure 1) summarizes the procedure for identifying, selecting, assessing eligibility, and including studies.
Data extraction
After selecting articles that met the established criteria and thoroughly reviewing each one, we organized the
information into a matrix to facilitate understanding of the results. This matrix recorded the article title,
authors, year of publication, the usefulness of the psychological autopsy, and the suicide risk factors identi-
fied in each study. We determined the usefulness of the psychological autopsy based on each study's objecti-
ves, procedures, and main findings. We extracted the risk factors directly from the authors' reported results.
This organization enabled orderly, detailed information collection for subsequent analysis (Table 2).
Methodological quality assessment
The evaluation of the methodological quality of the selected studies was carried out using the Critical
Review Form- Quantitative Studies (CRF-QS) instrument, developed by Law et al.
(23)
It consists of eight
general criteria and nineteen items that allow the assessment of aspects related to the purpose of the study,
literature, methodological design, sample, measurement, intervention, results, and conclusion with clinical
implications.
(24)
Two reviewers independently selected, extracted, and evaluated the studies, recording the information in a
data matrix. The reviewers resolved discrepancies through joint review until they reached consensus. Finally,
articles scoring above 16 points were included in the analysis.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 methodology used for the detection, selection, and categorization of studies performed.
RESULTS
Table 1. The following table presents the results of the analysis of the selected articles, organized by study objectives and defined themes.
DISCUSSION
The reviewed evidence suggests that psychological autopsy is a useful tool for identifying risk factors and
understanding the circumstances surrounding suicide in adolescents. One of its main contributions is integrating
information from family members, peers, teachers, and healthcare professionals, along with clinical, medical,
police, and forensic records.
(26,30-33,36)
This diversity of sources expands the information available about
adolescent’s life, since no single person necessarily knows all their experiences. Peers provided complementary
information about interpersonal relationships, school experiences, and social media use.
(33)
Furthermore, the
technique allowed for the exploration of warning signs that had not been recognized before death
(28)
and for
comparing the circumstances of suicide cases with those of deaths classified as accidents.
(36)
In this sense, the
usefulness of psychological autopsy is related to its ability to gather information from different sources and
approach aspects of adolescent’s life that may not have been previously identified.
Among the factors identified, those related to mental health and suicidal behavior were the most recurrent.
Depression and other mental disorders were present in several studies, as were histories of suicide attempts,
self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
(25,26,28,30,31,33-38)
The repeated presence of these factors shows that in different
cases there were manifestations of psychological distress before death. However, their identification should
not be interpreted in isolation, since they were accompanied by other circumstances present in the adolescents'
lives. Thus, the psychological autopsy allows us to place mental health difficulties and suicidal behavior
within the prior history of each case, avoiding reducing its understanding solely to the presence of a disorder
or a history of suicidal behavior.
(25-38)
The family environment was another recurring dimension in the reviewed studies. Family conflicts and
difficulties were identified
(25,26,30,33,34,37)
as well as domestic violence, physical and verbal abuse, dysfunctional
families, parental separation, and difficulties communicating problems to parents.
(25,26,28,29,35)
The coexistence
of these circumstances with a history of mental health issues and suicidal behavior suggests that, in some
cases, the adolescent's experiences were also linked to their family environment. Difficulties in communicating
problems are particularly relevant because certain experiences may not have been known to close adults. In
this sense, information obtained through post-death interviews can complement what the family had not
previously identified.
Reconstructed histories also included school, social, and emotional circumstances. Several studies described
academic pressure, study-related expectations, and school difficulties,
(26, 28, 33, 34, 37)
while others reported
bullying and cyberbullying.
(26, 27, 33, 35)
Added to this were social isolation, conflicts with friends, difficulties
in emotional relationships, and the loss of significant people.
(32-35, 37)
These findings broaden the understanding
of the factors identified through psychological autopsy, showing that the circumstances preceding suicide
were also related to everyday spaces of adolescent life, such as school, friendships, and emotional
relationships.
Other factors were identified in fewer studies. Alcohol and other substance use were described in several
studies,
(25, 26, 29-31, 33)
while impulsivity appeared in several of them.
(27, 29, 32, 35-37)
Irritability, aggression, and
anger were noted more frequently.
(30, 37)
The lower frequency of these elements requires cautious interpretation
in relation to each case's other circumstances. Specific conditions related to the digital environment were also
identified, such as excessive use of social media, social comparison, exposure to suicidal or self-harming
content, cyberbullying, suicidal contagion, and sextortion.
(27)
. Another study examined the availability of
firearms in the home, their normalization within the family, and their unsafe storage.
(38)
These findings show
that psychological autopsy can address specific dimensions according to the characteristics and circumstances
of each case.
The diversity of identified factors is also evident in those elements described only in specific studies. These
include forced labor during adolescence
(25)
sexual abuse,
(31)
grief, relationship breakups, and unplanned
pregnancy,
(34)
as well as exposure to suicides in the family or community.
(36)
Difficulties coping with
problems, unfulfilled aspirations, value conflicts, economic or social deprivation, low educational attainment,
and physical illnesses were also identified,
(32)
in addition to alcohol consumption by parents or caregivers.
(29)
Because these elements were reported on a case-by-case basis, it would not be appropriate to consider them
general characteristics of adolescents who died by suicide. Rather, their presence demonstrates that the
circumstances identified through psychological autopsy can vary among cases and encompass different
dimensions of the adolescent's life.
The participation of different informants is therefore key to assessing the technique's usefulness. Peers provided
information that complemented what parents provided, especially regarding psychological, academic, and
social aspects.
(33)
Similarly, the combination of interviews with clinical, police, and forensic records allowed
for the collection of information from different sources.
(26, 34, 36)
Since this is a reconstruction after death, the
information obtained depends on the memories, perceptions, and knowledge of those involved. Therefore, its
interpretation must consider the scope of the information available in each case.
Taken together, the reviewed studies show that the usefulness of the psychological autopsy relates to its ability
to integrate different sources of information and recognize factors across various dimensions of adolescents'
lives. Although some antecedents recurred, the diversity of circumstances identified does not allow for
establishing a universal hierarchy among the factors or causal relationships between them. Rather, the
studies show different combinations of individual, family, school, and social circumstances in the histories
analyzed.
(25-38)
This heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the evidence and when assessing
the possibility of extrapolating its results to other populations.
In the Ecuadorian context, these findings are particularly relevant considering that 1,106 suicides were recorded
in the country in 2023.
(4)
The reviewed evidence shows that psychological autopsy can provide information on
mental health history and suicidal behavior, family relationships, school and social experiences, as well as
other circumstances present before death.
(25-38)
However, the included studies were conducted in different
contexts, so their results cannot be directly extrapolated to the Ecuadorian adolescent population. This difference
should be considered when assessing the technique's usefulness in the country, particularly because the
situations identified may vary depending on the context in which adolescents live.
A limitation of this review was the limited availability of studies focused exclusively on adolescent populations.
Therefore, it was necessary to consider research that included different age groups and analyze only the
information corresponding to adolescents. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the studies, both in terms of the
context in which they were conducted and the circumstances analyzed, limits the generalizability of the
findings to other populations. Finally, reliance on informant-provided information and available records may
be subject to recall and information biases.
(26,33-36)
CONCLUSIONS
The psychological autopsy proved useful in identifying risk factors and reconstructing the events preceding
the adolescent suicide by integrating information provided by family members, close acquaintances, and
clinical or forensic records. Its application allowed for a deeper understanding of the experiences and
circumstances present before death, fostering a broader comprehension of the case.
The reviewed studies identified mental health problems, a history of self-harm and suicide attempts, adverse
experiences, and substance use, along with difficulties in family, school, and social environments, as the
main risk factors. Taking together, these findings show that adolescent suicide cannot be understood as a
single factor, but rather as a product of the various conditions present in an adolescent's life. From this
perspective, the identified factors highlight the need to consider the different dimensions involved in the
adolescent context holistically.
Funding: The authors fully covered the expenses generated by the research.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this scientific
article.
Contribution statement:
Leonor Jacqueline Moreano Jara and Erika Gabriela Márquez Flores prepared the article and participated
jointly in all stages of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
[cited 24 Jun 2026]; Available on: https://www.who.int/es/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_.
2. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 86(6):
436-443. Available on: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v86n6/art10.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. Suicide [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
4. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Candlelight: una luz de esperanza por la prevención del
suicidio en Quito [Internet]. Quito: MSP; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.salud.
gob.ec/candlelight-una-luz-de-esperanza-por-la-prevencion-del-suicidio-en-quito/.
5. Huaraca Urquizo MC, Martínez Mena MM. Factores de riesgo en la ideación suicida en estudiantes
adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2024 [cited 24 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/13115/1/Huaraca%20Urquizo%2C%
20M.%20-%20Mart%C3%ADnez%20Mena%2C%20M.%20%282024%29%20Fractores%20de%
20riesgo%20en%20la%20ideaci%C3%B3n%20suicida%20en%20estudiantes%20adolescentes..pdf.
6. Pandey G. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar disord. 2013 [cited 24 Jun 2026];
15(5): 524-541. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12089.
7. Theimer S. La relación entre genética y suicidio es complicada [Internet]. Mayo Clinic News
Network; 2017 Jul 10 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/es/
2017/07/10/la-relacion-entre-genetica-y-suicidio-es-complicada/.
8. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Situaciones de suicidios [Internet]. Quito: MINEDUC; 2023
[cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2023/11/
situaciones-de-suicidios.pdf .
9. Wu P, Hoven C, Liu X, Cohen P, Fuller C, Shaffer D. Substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts
in children and adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 34(4): 408-420.
Available on: https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.34.4.408.53733.
10. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
REE 20(3) Riobamba sep. - dic. 2026
cc
BY NC ND
145
ISSN-impreso 1390-7581
ISSN-digital 2661-6742
11. Serrano- Ruíz C, Olave- Chaves J. Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de conductas suicidas
en adolescentes. MedUNAB. 2017 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 139-147. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.29375/01237047.2272.
12. Londoño V, Cañón S. Factores de riesgo para conducta suicida en adolescentes escolarizados: revisión
de tema. Arch Med. 2020 [cited 24 Jun 2026 ]; 20(2): 472-480. Available on: https://docs.bvsalud.org/
biblioref/2020/09/1118907/18-revi-factores-de-riesgo-para-conducta-suicida.pdf.
13. Domínguez E, Meza M, Cañón S. Determinación de los factores de riesgo asociados a la conducta
suicida en adolescentes. Collection of Articles on Medicine. 2019 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 22-37. Available
on: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Ortiz_et_al_2019a.
14. García G, Francés B, Aguado B. Factores de riesgo de suicidio en niños y adolescentes: una revisión
bibliografía. Rev Psiquiatr Infanto- Juv. 2006 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 1(3-4): 1-6. Available on:
https://aepnya.eu/index.php/revistaaepnya/article/download/43/63/67.
15. Bhushan D, Yadav J, Moirangthem S, Arora A, Ramdas A. The psychological autopsy: An overview
of its utility and methodology. J Neurosci rural pract. 2023 [cited 24 Jun 2026]; 14(3): 447-452. Available
on: https://ruralneuropractice.com/the-psychological-autopsy-an-overview-of-its-utility-and-
methodology/.
16. Ramsland K. The Psychology of Death Investigations. Behavioral Analysis for Psychological
Autopsy and Criminal Profiling Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2018 [cited 24 Jun 2026]. Available
on: https://lmsspada.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/pluginfile.php/78918/mod_folder/content/0/The%20
psychology%20of%20death%20investigations%20_%20behavioral%20analysis%20for%20
psychological%20autopsy%20and%20criminal%20profiling%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf?
forcedownlo.
17. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic
review. Psychol Med. 2003 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 33(3):395-405. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1017/s0033291702006943.
18. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
19. Zapata- Ospina JP, Palacio Jaramillo JD, Amaya MA, García J, Vargas- Alzate CA. Suicidio en niños,
niñas y adolescentes en Colombia en el período 2013 a 2022: Análisis de datos epidemiológicos y
autopsias psicológicas [Internet]. Colombia: Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Medicina Legal y
Ciencias Forenses; 2022 [cited 25 jun 2026]. Available on: https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/
documents/20143/1091439/751_Suicidio_NNA.pdf.
20. Alarcón Chávez BE, Cedeño Cedeño VS. La Autopsia Psicológica en el suicidio de un adolescente:
Caso Clínico. Rev Caribeña Cienc Soc. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: https://dialnet.unirioja.
es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9908041.
21. Alcoba D. PRISMA y metaanálisis en la investigación científica. Fides et Ratio. 2024 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 28(28): 13-20. Available on: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-
081X2024000200013&lng=es&tlng=es.
22. Sánchez- Martín M, Pedreño M, Ponce A, Navarro- Mateu F. Y, al principio, fue la pregunta de
investigación: Los formatos PICO, PECO, SPIDER y FINER. Espiral Cuad Prof. 2023 [cited 20 Jul
2026]; 16(32): 126-136. Available on: https://portalinvestigacion.um.es/documentos/644962350b74
7824a2ab7b3a.
23. Silva D. Maltrato infantil y autoestima en adolescentes [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de
Chimborazo; 2025 [cited 25 Jun 2026]. Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/
14722/1/Silva%20G.%2c%20Darla%20A.%20%282025%29%20Maltrato%20infantil%20y%20
autoestima%20en%20adolescentes..pdf.
24. Cuzco L, Merchán C. Consumo de Alcohol y Conductas Sexuales de riesgo en adolescentes de
Latinoamérica [Tesis]. Riobamba: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo; 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026].
Available on: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/bitstream/51000/11855/1/Cuzco%20P%c3%a9rez%20%
2c%20L%20y%20%20Merch%c3%a1n%20Gaspar%2c%20C%20%282023%29%20Consumo%
20de%20alcohol%20y%20conductas%20sexuales%20de%20riesgo%20en%20adolescentes%20de%
20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.%20.%28Tesis%20de%20Pregrado%29Universidad%20Nacional%20de%
20Chimborazo%2c%20Riobamba%20%2cEcuador..pdf.
25. Beltrán L, Echeverri-Londoño M, Rojas L, & Fandiño-Losada A. Psychological autopsy study of
suicide risk factors in the Colombian Coffee Region. Colomb Med (Cali). 2025 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
56(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12503112/.
26. Mérelle S, Van Bergen D, Looijmans M, Balt E, Rasing S, van Domburgh L, et al. A multi-method
psychological autopsy study on youth suicides in the Netherlands in 2017: Feasibility, main outcomes,
and recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 15(8): 1-12. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0238031.
27. Balt E, Mérelle S, Robinson J, Popma A, Creemers D, van den Brand I, et al. Social media use of
adolescents who died by suicide: lessons from a psychological autopsy study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2023 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 17(48): 1-11. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-
023-00597-9.
28. Jung Lee Y, Kweon YS, Hyong Kang Y, Yoon KH, Lee MS, Bhang SY, et al. Suicide warming sings
that are challenging to recognize: a psychological autopsy study of Korean adolescents. Child Adolesc
Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 18(41): 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/
10.1186/s13034-024-00731-1.
29. González- Castro T, Tovilla- Zárate C, Hernández- Díaz Y, Juárez-Rojop I, León- Garibay A,
Guzmán- Priego C, et al. Características de niños y adolescentes mexicanos que murieron por suicidio:
Un estudio de autopsias psicológicas. Rev Med Forense y Legal. 2017 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 52: 236-240.
Disponible e mvjjufun: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X17301543.
30. Abdullah M, Tahir Khalily MPhil M, Ahmad I, Hallahan B. Psychological autopsy review on mental
health crises and suicide among youth in Pakistan. Asia- Pac Psychiatry. 2018 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
10(4): 1-20. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12338.
31. Werbart A, Sorjonen K, Runeson B, Rydelius PA. Who is at Risk of Dying young from suicide and
sudden violent death? Common and specific risk factors among children, adolescents, and youg
adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 [cited 25 Jun 2026]; 50(4): 757-777. Available on:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012342/.
32. Sun L, Li H, Zhang J, Wu Q. Psychological strains and suicide intent: Results from a psychological
autopsy study with Chinese rural young suicides. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 [cited 25 Jun 2026];
61(7): 677-683. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573087.
33. Looijmans M, van Bergen D, Mérelle S, Gilissen R, Popma A, Balt E, et al. Additional Value of Peer
Informants in Psychological Autopsy Studies of Youth Suicides. Qual Health Res. 2021 [cited 25 Jun
2026]; 31(11): 2056-2068. Available on: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497323211022316.
34. Ben Soussia R, Mesrati M, Grayaa M, Kouada R, Melki R, Bouali W, Zarrouk L, & Aissaoui A.
Childhood suicide in Tunisia: Forensic and Psychological Aspects. La Tunisie Med. 2026 [cited 21 Jul
2026]; 104(2): 350-355. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42223464/.
35. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, Lundervold A, & Groholt B. Differences between children and adolescents
who commit suicide and their peers: A psychological autopsy of suicide victims compared to accident
victims and a community sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026];
6(1). Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3284874/.
36. Freuchen A, Kjelsberg E, & Groholt B. Suicide or accident? A psychological autopsy study of suicide
in youths under the age of 16 compared to deaths labeled as accidents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ment Health. 2012 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 6(1): 30. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3526543/.
37. Kumar K, Duraiappa M, Thekke P. Psycho Social factors in adolescent suicides- A psychological
autopsy-based study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020 [cited 21 Jul 2026]; 14(3): 402-6. Available
on: https://medicopublication.com/index.php/ijfmt/article/view/10392.
38. Kelly M, Devinney A, Bryant B, Dean S, Li L, Berman Al, et al. Familial firearm culture among the
families of youth who died by firearm suicide in Maryland: a qualitative analysis of psychological
autopsy interviews. Inj Prev. 2025 [cited 23 Jul 2026]; 31(4): 273-279. Available on: https://pmc.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12912719/.